Why Is Obama So Committed To The Buffett Rule?

Seriously!  It is strange.  His continued commitment to an idea that does nothing to substantially reduce the deficit is quite bizarre at this point.  Why place your entire political reputation on this non-issue?  The only thing that the so-called Buffet-rule seems to accomplish is to "stick it to the wealthy."

As has been reported (even by the MSM, so you know it must be true as it they tend to support Obama at all costs), raising taxes on the wealthy does not impact our deficit in any real way.

Here is a great write-up from bankruptingamerica.org:

For years the U.S. has had an unfortunate habit of spending far more than we can afford, sending us trillions into debt. Some have suggested we should tax our way out of it. Before Tax Day 2012, we go beyond the question of whether we should, and ask a more important question: can we?

Are Taxes Enough?

In 2008, the independent Congressional Budget Office was asked to determine what the tax rates would have to be if they used “higher income tax rates alone to finance the increases in spending projected.”¹This was the last time the CBO did such an analysis.

Here is what the CBO determined at the time:

In order to keep up with projected spending, taxes would have to increase:²

• Corporate: current top rate 35%; rate increase to 88%
• Highest income tax rate: current rate 35%; rate increase to 88%
• Near-the-middle income tax rate: current rate 25%; rate increase to 63%
• Lowest income tax rate: current rate 10%; rate increase to 25%

What is the “Buffett Rule” Tax?

Recently, President Obama has called for fairness in the tax code. The president says one way to do this is to enact the so-called “Buffett Rule.” Under this proposal, wealthy Americans would pay a minimum tax rate of 30 percent. One reason some wealthy Americans can pay a lower tax rate is because investment income is taxed at a lower tax rate than ordinary income.³

• According to the analysis, however, the proposed tax would do almost nothing in terms of deficit reduction.  Congress' independent tax analysis arm, the Joint Committee on Taxation, determined this proposed tax would raise just $47 billion over the next 10 years.  When looking at the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office's projected debt over the next decade of $21.665 trillion, $47 billion represents 0.2 percent in defecit reduction.

The facts show that this proposed tax would do almost nothing in terms of deficit reduction. (bold added)